2010 Lotus Exige S 260 Sport – Short Take Road Test «
2010 Lotus Exige S 260 Sport – Short Take Road Test
After a short spin in the Lotus Exige S 260 Sport at this year’s 10Best trials, our editor-in-chief said driving it was like cheating death. He required a post-drive smoke to cool off.
With all Lotus cars, heart-pounding thrills come by way of lightness. The S 260 goes the full monty, shedding weight by using carbon fiber wherever feasible. The total weight savings add up to 60 pounds less than an Exige S, or 2000 at the curb.
The supercharged, 1.8-liter Toyota four-cylinder makes 17 more horsepower than the step-down S 240 model by way of engine-software adjustments. But two trips to the track left the $76,120 S 260 ($9305 more than the S 240) limping home. On the third attempt, the best 0-to-60 time we could produce was a disappointing 4.3 seconds. We’ve hit that mark 0.2 second sooner in the heavier, 220-hp S. Also, we had an S 260 at our recent Lightning Lap event, where it failed to navigate Virginia International Raceway’s 4.1-mile Grand Course any quicker than the 220-hp Exige S did in 2007.
The S 260 comes standard with all the track-focused options: a limited-slip differential, adjustable dampers, even launch control. Still, the narrowest of test drivers thought the “upgraded” carbon-fiber-framed seats were too pinchy. The ProBax seats in the standard Exige keep your body in place with an unexpected amount of comfort, further encouraging a base-model purchase. And remember, all this stuff made the Exige S 260 no quicker on one of America’s premier racetracks.
However, no Exige pinches on the fun-to-drive factor. With Victorinox-sharp turn-in, the unquantifiable extra horsepower slips from mind on an entertaining road because maximizing lateral acceleration (1.01 g on the skidpad) becomes the major concern. The brake-pedal pressure loads up as it would in a car without power assist, adding to the unprocessed delights.
Few cars deliver the unabridged driving entertainment that this Lotus does. Unfortunately, most of those other “few” are also made by Lotus, and they are only slightly more comfortable and less expensive. So why would one pay more for the presumably better S 260
Leave a Reply
Features
MORE FEATURES
Album Reviews
- Golf blue-e-motion Signals Electrics Coming to VW Line
- 2011 Volkswagen Jetta S – Short Take Road Test
- 2010 Saturn Aura / 2010 Pontiac G6 / 2009 Opel Insignia – Mini Test Road Test
- 2011 Mini Countryman – Prototype Drive
- 2011 Rolls-Royce Ghost – First Drive Review
- 2010 Mazdaspeed 3 – Long-Term Road Test Update
- 2011 Ford F-150 SVT Raptor SuperCrew – Short Take Road Test
- 2010 Lexus RX450h All-Wheel Drive – Short Take Road Test
- 2011 Cadillac CTS-V Sport Wagon – Long-Term Road Test Intro
- 2012 Ford Focus U.S.-Spec – First Drive Review
- 2009 Ford Taurus / Mercury Sable – Review
- World Exclusive! 2012 Lexus LFA Tested – Short Take Road Test
- 2010 Toyota Camry SE – Short Take Road Test
- Volvo S60 first drive : Stunning Swede
- 2011 Infiniti IPL G Coupe – Short Take Road Test
- 2010 Lincoln MKT With EcoBoost – Short Take Road Test
- Mercedes-Benz C-Class Coupe driven – What’s new?
- 2008 Smart Fortwo Passion Coupe – Road Test
- 2011 Lamborghini Aventador LP700-4 – First Drive Review
- 2012 Chrysler 300C SRT8 / Dodge Charger SRT8 – Feature
- 2011 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport SE 4WD – Short Take Road Test